Comparison
Stealth Browsers for Scraping - Camoufox vs undetected-chromedriver vs Playwright Stealth
Compare the top stealth browser solutions for web scraping: Camoufox, undetected-chromedriver, and Playwright Stealth. See which bypasses anti-bot detection best.
When managed APIs are not an option, stealth browsers are the next best tool for bypassing anti-bot detection. Here is how the three main options compare.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Camoufox | undetected-chromedriver | Playwright Stealth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Browser | Firefox (patched) | Chrome | Chromium/Firefox/WebKit |
| Patch Level | C++ source | Binary patching | JavaScript injection |
| Detection Resistance | Excellent | Good | Moderate |
| Speed | Moderate | Moderate | Fast |
| Async Support | Yes | No (Selenium-based) | Yes |
| Maintenance | Active | Active | Community maintained |
Camoufox
The strongest stealth option. Patches Firefox at the source code level, so detection scripts cannot see JavaScript-level modifications.
from camoufox.sync_api import Camoufox
with Camoufox(humanize=True) as browser:
page = browser.new_page()
page.goto("https://nowsecure.nl")
print(page.title())
Pros: Best detection evasion, realistic fingerprints, human-like input simulation Cons: Firefox-only, requires binary download, smaller community
undetected-chromedriver
A patched Selenium ChromeDriver that removes common automation indicators.
import undetected_chromedriver as uc
driver = uc.Chrome(version_main=136)
driver.get("https://nowsecure.nl")
print(driver.title)
driver.quit()
Pros: Uses real Chrome, large community, easy Selenium integration Cons: Selenium-based (no async), slower, still detectable by advanced systems
Playwright Stealth
JavaScript-level patches applied to Playwright browsers via playwright-stealth.
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
from playwright_stealth import stealth_sync
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.launch(headless=False)
page = browser.new_page()
stealth_sync(page)
page.goto("https://nowsecure.nl")
print(page.title())
browser.close()
Pros: Multi-browser support, fast, excellent async API, Playwright ecosystem Cons: JavaScript patches are easier to detect, requires ongoing updates
Detection Test Results
Testing against common anti-bot platforms:
| Anti-Bot System | Camoufox | undetected-chromedriver | Playwright Stealth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudflare | Pass | Pass | Sometimes |
| DataDome | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| PerimeterX | Pass | Sometimes | Fail |
| Akamai | Pass | Sometimes | Sometimes |
| Kasada | Sometimes | Fail | Fail |
Results vary by site configuration and may change as detection systems update.
Recommendation
For the most reliable approach, use a managed service like ScraperAPI or ScrapingAnt. They handle all detection evasion and scale horizontally.
For self-hosted scraping:
- Start with Camoufox for the best detection evasion
- Use Playwright Stealth if you need speed and async
- Use undetected-chromedriver if you are already invested in Selenium